Saturday, March 13, 2010

Bing's Autosuggest Integrates Query History

Personalized search suggestions now available from historical search clues.

Bing has made an update to its query suggestion feature that incorporates a bit of personalization. Since many web users tend to return to similar search topics, it makes sense to incorporate relevant terms into query suggestions. And that's just what Bing has done with its Autosuggest feature. It will now take query history into consideration when serving up suggested keywords.


Suggestions based on query history are in purple, similar to a visited link. The other suggestions are in blue, similar to an unvisited link.





If you don't want Bing all up in your query history, serving up search suggestions, you can set your preferences by clicking "Manage History" when the search suggestion box pops up.

Before you get all in a tizzy and tell us that Google's already doing this, we know. They integrated query history into Suggest last May.

For comparison purposes, I've included a screenshot of Google's suggestions for the same query. I don't know which ones are based on my history. Fewer seem to be since I searched both Google and Bing in the past month for quite a few of the same knitting-related queries. The location-based suggestions are about 2,000 miles off. In this case, Bing's suggestions (above) were much better tailored to me.


Thursday, March 11, 2010

Get Your Search Campaigns Ready for the Yahoo/MSN Merger

Now that all the regulating bodies have approved the Yahoo and MSN search merger, the official waiting begins. Nothing is happening immediately; actually, there are more unanswered questions about the intimate details.

Not to worry. We have at least until Q3 before some top advertisers will be migrated, assuming things go well. Even the official press release notes that they will wait until after Q4 and the retail holiday season if things aren't smooth.

While all the technical and practical details are being worked out, here are a few things you may want to think about.

Start Running on MSN Search

This isn't a sales pitch for MSN, but more a precautionary measure. My gut tells me that folks who don't already have some established quality score credit with MSN when everyone gets merged will be at a disadvantage.

The thought is this: the bid landscape will already be irrational as people try and make their way, and having some baseline of performance prior to this period will be a competitive advantage. Any quality score or historical data from Yahoo probably won't be moved to MSN. The data requirements of lining up the various systems are just too daunting; from match type variations, to the variances in ad copy destination URLs.

Blocking Referrers; Choosing Your Network

Having the ability to choose if you run on Yahoo only, or including their partner sites is coming soon. This is long overdue, and will help advertisers' performance.

However, Yahoo has taken it a step further and allowed advertisers to run on their partner network only. Now I'm not sure how many advertisers this will make sense for, but this additional targeting tool may help those niche players who want to bid specifically for a Yahoo network partner. This can be done by targeting the Yahoo partner network only, and then blocking referring sites that don't match their criteria.

The ability to block poor referring partner sites is something that has greatly improved our clients results, and is something that is differentiating in the marketplace today, even when compared to Google.

Yahoo is Testing Some Positive Betas

Similar to Google's Sitelinks, Yahoo is testing their version, known as Rich Ads in Search. These ads apply to top branded terms, and allow advertisers to provide deep links to their consumers to access specific promotions, or search their site.

These ads have recently been opened up to more advertisers, and are now CPC based versus a fixed cost model they used during the beta. Below are a few examples, as well as the impact on results we've seen early on.

Yahoo is promoting about a 25 percent increase in CTR. Expect these betas to be around for the long term. But even if they aren't, why pass up the volume while it's available?







It's still too soon to determine how this merger will impact the search landscape, and there's a lot of time still to figure it out. In the meantime, don't let innovation and change pass you by.

Testing will be more important than ever this year -- from basic ad copy testing to more advanced beta testing. As paid search becomes a more integrated part of your online media strategy, it isn't OK to accept it at face value.

Join us for Search Engine Strategies New York from March 22-26, 2010. Approximately 5,000 marketers and search engine optimization professionals attend SES New York each year to network and learn about topics such as PPC management, keyword research, SEO, social media, local, mobile, link building, duplicate content, multiple site issues, video optimization, site optimization, usability and more. SES New York will be packed with 70+ sessions, multiple keynotes, 100+ exhibitors, networking events and parties. Your customers, colleagues and competition will be in attendance -- will you?

Don't Over Optimize Your Site

A little SEO knowledge can be dangerous. In fact, it can be disastrous for publishers who learn their first few tidbits of information, and then begin to apply it to their sites. The problem it can lead to is known as "over optimization."

Search engines look at a variety of signals for ranking purposes, as well as spam detection purposes. This includes a site review to determine if it's over optimized, and can result in the rankings for a site being dropped to a lower position than they may otherwise occupy.

Unnatural behavior of any kind can lead to a site being flagged for over optimization. Here are some examples:
Pages that have identical page titles and H1 headings. This is more likely to be viewed as over optimization if subheadings on the page also repeat the key phrase, or if all the internal links to the page use anchor text that exactly matches the page title.

This bears a strong resemblance to the keyword stuffing practices from the early days of optimization, though at a lesser scale. In general, people don't write that way naturally, and it looks bad to a user, a human reviewer at a search engine, and to the search engine's algorithms.


Too many non-contextual internal links on your site. For example, many publishers know the value of linking to their most important pages from other pages on their site. Certainly, you can take your 10 most important pages and link to them from nearly every page of your site. But when the list of cross links grows too large (even 25 is getting there), you're beginning to push your luck).


Having pages with great visual experiences above the fold, and not finding text until well below the fold. Publishers who first learn about the value of keywords, and also about the long tail, are prone to doing this. They generate large blocks of text which users likely won't even see, and if they do, they will quickly ignore.

This text, because it isn't intended for users, is often poorly written and crammed with keywords and internal links with rich anchor text. Sometimes it appears as if publishers go out of their way to make the text user unfriendly. For example, a huge block of 25 lines of text in one paragraph isn't intended for users!

Summary

Take care when you optimize a page. There's little reward, and possibly even a negative penalty, for doing too much to try and support ranking for a particular key phrase, or set of phrases. Let the content from those pages be a bit more focused on the user and optimizing conversion. You might just find that this is the best SEO tactic.

Also, be careful when providing SEO training to your writers. Many writers with good intentions have turned in articles to me that were crammed with keywords (and those writers were promptly instructed to re-write the articles).

The problem is that the result didn't look right to the average reader. Let your writers write good stuff, without burdening them with lots of SEO instructions. You just don't know where they'll go with it.

Give them the desired title of the article, tell them the topics and sub-topics you would like covered, and let them write. You'll be better off for it.

Join us for Search Engine Strategies New York from March 22-26, 2010. Approximately 5,000 marketers and search engine optimization professionals attend SES New York each year to network and learn about topics such as PPC management, keyword research, SEO, social media, local, mobile, link building, duplicate content, multiple site issues, video optimization, site optimization, usability and more. SES New York will be packed with 70+ sessions, multiple keynotes, 100+ exhibitors, networking events and parties. Your customers, colleagues and competition will be in attendance -- will you?

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Google Launches DoubleClick for Publishers

It's the latest ad serving platform from Google. DoubleClick for Publishers (DFP) is designed to assist online publishers with fulfilling their ad inventory. This is most useful in addressing a variety of advertising options such as timing and unexpected traffic surges.

The new platform is available in two offerings: DoubleClick for Publishers, for large sites, and DFP Small Business, a free version for smaller sites.

DoubleClick for Publishers will replace DART for Publishers, but the transition will occur over the next year. Additionally, Google Ad Manager customers will be upgraded to DFP Small Business over the next few weeks.

Here's what to expect when you get the switchover:
A new interface
More detailed reporting and forecasting data
Improved ad performance and delivery algorithms
A new, public API
Integration with the new DoubleClick Ad Exchange's "dynamic allocation" feature, which enables publishers open their bids to multiple networks

Universal Search Optimization 101

Now that we've covered the fundamentals of universal search, it's time to look at how to optimize for this new search experience.

Universal (or blended) search refers to the non-traditional results we see in the SERPs. The results could be video, images, local search, news, shopping, or other rich content. Let's look at specific things you should do to optimize these areas.

Optimize for Image Search

You've probably heard the adage that a picture speaks a thousand words. Well why not use that to your advantage?

Web sites are often too text heavy. Choosing the right images to help tell the story without a lot of text can provide a better user experience if done correctly. Sometimes images help create an emotional attachment to the products or services you offer.

To optimize for universal or blended search:
Incorporate rich ALT text for each image. Remember to intuitively describe the image using targeted keywords. The more descriptive the better.

Include your keywords in the image file names.

Make sure that the content that surrounds the image is highly relevant. Relevancy is always a key factor in optimization.

Optimize for Video Search

Video has become one of the best tools for optimization because it serves multiple purposes. It helps engage visitors, keeps them on your site longer, and reduces your bounce rate.

One of the best ideas for developing video content is to add instructional or how-to videos. Try keeping them between two to three minutes in length.

Don't forget the crucial step of tagging your video with the right keywords. Upload your video to popular video sites like YouTube to help get more exposure and increase popularity.

Friday, January 1, 2010

Happy New Year !!!! 2010

Heya Ma Frnds !!!! Wish Yew A Very Very Happy New Year !!!!


Great White Shark!!!


. . . is a common one, shared by anyone who has ever looked at the sea and imagined the monsters it contains. It goes something like this. You're swimming in the ocean just after dusk, salty black water surrounding you as far as you can see. Weary from swimming, you rest for a moment, letting your feet drift lazily down as you look at the points of light just beginning to appear overhead. Panic, dull at first but growing with intensity, hits when you realize that you cannot touch the bottom. You decide you can brave the moment it would take to test the water just beneath your toes but surface quickly in a panic when you feel nothing.

It's then that you feel it; a gentle swell lifting you from below and to the left, a movement of water that indicates that you are not alone in this patch of sea and that something . . . something big . . . . is very nearby. Just as the thought registers, you turn in time to see a fin edging its way through the water towards you. As it closes in, you see a giant conical snout rising, its mouth yawning open . . .

My apologies to Peter Benchley aside, the preceding sentences represent a primal fear that each and every human possesses deep in their subconscious, a fear of being attacked and eaten alive. There are a few predators on Earth are capable of such a thing but none quite so terrifying as Carcharodon carcharias, the Great White Shark. But is the nightmare accurate? Is the monster the true beast or is there another side to this magnificent creature?